The NUT are reporting that the Department for Education has agreed concessions on their guidance about the childcare disqualification requirements. On the Nottingham City NUT website, it states:
“The Union’s threat to challenge the DfE’s supplementary advice on the Childcare Disqualification legislation and its application to schools in the High Court has successfully drawn concessions from the Government who are now proposing changes to the guidance.
The supplementary advice was published on www.Gov.UK in October last year, with no warning and no consultation with the relevant trade unions, causing widespread confusion and concern. Despite this, the Union was able to initiate legal proceedings before the Christmas break, challenging the DfE’s interpretation of the legislation.
As a result of the NUT’s challenge, the DfE conceded last week that:
- the legislation applies only to those who work in nursery and reception, or who supervise activities outside school hours involving children under 8 years old;
- enquiries about individuals living in a teacher’s household should be restricted only to those falling within the scope of the legislation
- teachers correctly identified as falling within the scope of the legislation should not be asked to disclose the ‘spent’ convictions or cautions of people in their household.
We have agreed not to pursue the Judicial Review if these concessions are included in revised guidance to schools and local authorities. The DfE has now agreed to a specific meeting with the Union in addition to a round of stakeholder discussions, the last of which will be held on 27 January 2015. We have brought together other organisations who are supporting our position, and it is intended that a common position will be put forward on the content of updated guidance.
Our aim in the long run is to seek to change the relevant legislation. In the meantime, we are seeking that the Government amends the guidance to advise schools how to implement the legislation in a proportionate way, placing lowest level of burden possible on schools and teachers and providing advice and assistance to enable members return to work where they have been wrongly identified as ‘disqualified’ and suspended as a consequence.”
As soon as revised guidance is available, we will publish a link as a further update to the section about this in the policy area of our website.
Learn more about this topic
- Emirates to Margate: We join Margate FC to fight stigma
- Unlock CEO in The Express: “We can’t expect people leave prison having worked it all out for themselves”
- Celebrating our volunteers: National Volunteers’ Week!
- Unlock response to the Independent Sentencing Review
- Unlock CEO Paula Harriott: Reflection six months into the role
Most popular articles from Unlock
- Filtering process for old/minor convictions put forward by Government
- Successes in getting visas to travel to the US
- Unlock speaks to Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour about the launch of it’s #Fairchecks campaign
- Insurance industry trade body issues updated guidance to insurers on how they should treat people with convictions
- Unlock CEO in The Express: “We can’t expect people leave prison having worked it all out for themselves”

Comments
Add Comment